so I was thinking that mark ruffalo sounds a lot like mark buffalo, and then i decided that i obviously wasn’t going to be the only one who thought about this. so i typed ‘ruffalo the buffalo’ into google images and i found these…
i don’t know why but it made me happy
I don’t know why but it makes me happy too.
irish is such a shady language because hello is “dia duit” but directly translated it means “god be with you” and when someone says hello back they say “dia is muire duit” which means “god and mary be with you” .. its like “i see your god and i raise you the holy virgin whatcha gonna do bout it bitch”
irish isnt a language…
so, i have this book.
"How To Attain and Practice The Ideal Sex Life" by Dr. J. Rutgers
first off, this book is hysterical, for many many reasons, but what really surprised me was they had a chapter dedicated to homosexuality
Just as the majority of us feel ourselves sexually attracted to persons of the opposite sex (heterosexuality), so also there are men and women who feel attracted, with equally pure and lofty motives, to members of their own sex (homosexuality).
In this chapter we are not referring to those cases in which persons seek their sexual satisfaction with those of the same sex on purpose as an exceptional experiment, or because there is no member of the opposite sex available. We are now dealing exclusively those persons in whom this individual peculiarity is deeply rooted in their mentality, either inborn, strictly speaking, or as such a direct consequence of influences to which they have been subjected in their early childhood, that it can hardly be distinguished from an inborn tendency. This preference for one’s own sex may indeed be so marked as to be quite exclusive, with a pronounced dislike for the opposite sex. Here it is not a case of “are there such people?”, but “such people do exist.”
like…DUDE you told me earlier in this damn book that if i wanna masturbate i should wait 24 hours to see if the urge passes as it’s such a Wrong and Deviant Thing To Do but this is…surprisingly progressive for a book in the 1940s, if really transphobic, cissexist, biphobic and binaristic…
and then there’s this bit where i’m TRULY floored
We often express pity for homosexuals as if they were hampered in their choice of intimate attachments; but we forget that we heterosexuals are equally hampered. It is just as if right-handed people should pity the left-handed ones; but those people who are as clever with their left hand as with the right, i.e., who are ambidextrous, may claim to occupy a higher place.
Who knows if the time will not also come one day, when the highest class of people will be ambisexual, feeling affection for both sexes alike, according to the agreement and harmony of their characters, and not always considering the difference of sex as the cardinal point. When they will not be in love with the sex , but will feel attracted by personal human sympathy. Only then such highly gifted people would have the right to despise us ordinary heterosexual mortals as they would the homosexuals, on account of our limitations.
excuse me, doctor but did you just actually write the phrase “ordinary heterosexual mortals” and imply that non-monosexualites are enlightened and better than the others i’m HAVING HYSTERICS
but let’s just stop for a moment and appreciate those three words one more time
"ordinary heterosexual mortals"
thank you for your time
okay but was there really a time when men were kind?? when their voices were soft??? and their words inviting??? was there
Yeah, plenty of men are still like this. A lot of us have just been hurt by ungrateful women and have no reason to put up the chivalry act anymore without being shown we’re gonna get the same love and respect in return. Respect goes both ways, don’t expect if you can’t supply.
To the first person. Fuck yourself. To the second person. Nailed it.
do u guys think we should tell them
I don’t know guys, should we?
oh my god
the cute boy at box office, right
his name’s Jay DeYonker
A GUY WITH AN IMDB PAGE FLIRTED WITH ME????
Science has been severely misrepresented by authors. If you want to write about scientific worldviews accurately, here are some tips.
- If a scientist saw something supernatural and could be assured it existed, they wouldn’t scream “that’s impossible!” or try to destroy it because it doesn’t fit their worldview. They would be more likely to say “How interesting. I wonder how this will change my theories. I’d better incorporate it into my worldview.”
- Scientists have morals just like the rest of us. In fact, many people become scientists because they want to help humanity. How is that so hard to understand?
- A whole lot of scientists love nature and want to preserve it.
- Scientists who have helped to create deadly weapons almost always regret it. Politicians who order those weapons to be used don’t.
- Science in general would be attracted to magic, not repulsed by it. A new thing to study with possible new applications to help mankind? How wonderful!
- How well a scientist understands people and gets along socially is up to the individual. They’re not an entire profession of evil, cold robots.
if it’s late enough and you’re lonely enough, the carly rae jepsen lyric “before you came into my life i missed you so bad” starts seeming increasingly deep and emotionally complex
3:02 AM and this fucking lyric looks like fucking nietzsche
stare into the abyss and the abyss will call you maybe
UGH OKAY SO I WROTE A FULL-BLOWN NIETZSCHE-RELATED PARODY OF CALL ME MAYBE
IT’S FOUR IN THE MORNING I HATE MYSELF
on the bright side i just spent like 3 hours reading about nietzsche and now i can tell you lots of things about nietzsche